Saturday, September 7, 2013

Some dude eating it in Schulenberg Bikepark

Schulenberg Bikepark, Harz, Germany.

Hitting a 4.7m(15 feet+) roadgap is one thing, tricking it, is a whole different ballgame.

This guy did it 3 times in a row, but third time he did it, he crashed - and I had my camera rolling at 240 fps...

240fps. Simple edit. No sound. 32 sec.

Mad props to this guy. Besides some scratches and bruises (and a twisted wheel) he was ok.

Seat in one direction, bar in an other, actual frame in a third : )

Saturday, August 31, 2013

I only ride park!!

...well actually I don't. But its the title of a seriously funny song, that you check out here

Aaaanyway, had 3 days in 3 different bikeparks in the Harz mountains with Drea. 16 gigs of gopro-footage later (and a hell of alot editing time), and I present you my vid "3".

The parks them-selves represent very different quality levels. From Braunlage bikepark, which should be a text-book example of how not to design a park. To Hahnenklee, that's actually passable for a single good day of riding, to Schulenberg - a place by riders, for riders, and trail design reflects that -no "Joey's" in this park..

I hope you enjoy.

Watch the HD version HERE.

4m12sec. HD option available. Embedded version:

Monday, August 26, 2013

4 shots from the perhaps most overlooked riding place in Eastern Europe

Why am I the only one riding this place?? For AM riding, this place is fucking sick! Want lift assisted DH/FR as well, this place got you covered for that too.. 

I am talking about the Tatra Mountains. I went there a few weeks ago (again), and shot a few pics:

You can just barely see the trail if you enlarge
(click to enlarge)

This place boarders on the edge between Poland and Slovakia, its actually Poland on the left, and Slovakia on the right.
(click to enlarge)

Trails like this warm my heart : )
(click to enlarge)

See you next time.
(click to enlarge)

I wrote a whole lot more about this place, here, and here, and here! And a great video here! Check it out.

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Tree-gap vid

Being the first person to hit something is always freaking me out a bit. I would sometimes prefer not to do it, to be honest, but hey, someone has to be the first one, right?
But luckily it always ends up with this: The definition of good times.

So the hard thing was to find the right speed. I obviously didn't want to undershoot it, and die, but I didn't want to overshoot it either. So some testing had to be done on a nearby jump to the right of the tree-gap. Anyway, just watch it:

Watch in HD HERE

2m 07sec

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Random stuff

A couple of random shots, enjoy.

Lets start of with a bike. This is the 2013 Gt Force, and the lucky owner is my buddy Karl. A full carbon frame, with the I-drive system(150mm). Its got a Fox 32 150mm up front, a Fox Kashima RP3 out back, XTR gears, Easton EA70 hoops, R1 Brakes and a Raceface Next crank. Not a bad setup, but it needs a dropper post, if it wants to be taken seriously tho' ; )
(click to en large)

In action.
(click to enlarge)

Needs more bandages!!
(click to enlarge)

2 very different forest-rockets.
(click to enlarge)

Dear Fox. Your close competitor (RockShox), makes full use of travel on its forks, you should try that on your future lineup.
 (click to enlarge)

Gapping the tree-gap. You get 8-10 meters of air time, and you can actually see the tree below me in this shot. More on this jump soon.
 (click to enlarge)

Monday, August 12, 2013

Trying the line to the left...

...and failing doing so.

Simple edit. 60sec. HD option available HERE.

Sunday, August 4, 2013

The Anatomy of Intelligent Trail Design

Is the best tool for trailbuilding an axe, or chainsaw? Or a shovel perhaps? Its neither, the best tool for trailbuilding is this:


But how does brain neurons translate into great trails? Well, keep on reading, as I respectfully shed some light on that, lets start with the most basic thing:

What do you want?
DO: Have a plan and a vision. What direction do you want the trail to take? Do you want flow? Or a tech section, something open and fast? Or perhaps something super tight? Be progressive, not conservative. Ambition doesn't hurt either. Determination is your friend.

DON'T: Have a great flow one second, going right into something awkward that destroys the experience or flow. Know what you want from the trail experience, don't wander in the dark.
Real life example: 2 of the most popular local xc-trails provide small drops - followed by a very tight left/right turn. What this means is, that the drops has to be taken at very slow speed, punishing experienced riders who rides fast over drops. Don't punish fast riders!


Plan 3 steps ahead.
DO: See a trail-section in parts. Its easy to understand, hard to master. There is a start (green), a middle (blue), and an end (black). This can be applied to a trail that's 50m long, or 500 meters long, and anything in between. The important thing is to connect these sections in the best possible way. One have to complement the other, like a synergy.
Real life example: Ever been to Whislter? Or some place where every part just made sense, where the green blue and black part where working together in perfect harmony? Then you know what I'm talking about.

DON'T: Be lured by something that might look attractive as a trail (green or blue or black) but it just doesn't match with the other colors.
Real life example: I remember when a friend of mine found a really nice drop, with a good run-in, and a nice transition, after the transition however, there was a natural ditch, rumply ending any possibility for any further advance. So to use the color codes again; He had his green (fun run-in) and blue section (good drop), but the black section was missing(end).

Think of a trail in longer segments, then divide these segments into parts.
Here you have a single segment of a trail, divided into 3 parts:

Make it worth while.
DO: Reward the rider. Make the rider forget that pain in the legs during the climb, the prospect and anticipation of that sweet rewarding descend is worth the entire climb, two fold!

DON'T: Punish the rider. Don't demotivate the rider, to take that climb to the top, where all that awaits is a dull descend. Its ok to let the rider work for his carrot, but let that carrot be as sweet as possible.
Real life example: We all been there: climbing a  hard mountain to the top, just to see that the entire descend afterwards, is a dual track gravel fireroad.



Build stuff that challenge you beyond your "safety box".
DO: Build jumps and drops that seems to be just a tad too big or high/steep. Make stuff difficult. Within a few weeks you WILL be riding it, and even hitting it hard.
Note: Sketchy does not necessary equal fun. Challenge, however, equals fun.

DON'T: Build stuff that you can ride full throttle the very moment its build. There is no progressive challenge in that, and you will most likely get bored with this feature within a very short time. There are exceptions to this rule, but they are rare.


Understanding kinematics.
This is probably some of hardest things to master. How a bike rolls, and how much energy it costs. But its also one of the most important things, as its a fundamental part if you want to achieve "flow". Some trail builders have a great understanding of kinematics - perhaps even without knowing it. Others, are completely oblivious about it, and build as if gravity didn't exist. It does however - and its all about taming it to an kinematic advantage. There is much more to be said about this subject, but I would probably run out of ink..
DO: Be smart, be clever, and use the kinematics to your advantage.

DON'T: Ignore the physics, ITS THE LAW.
Real life example: Too many to mention here, its a huge problem.


If it doesn't work, don't use it.
Sometimes, something just doesn't work. Its only human nature to fail once in a while, luckily its also human nature to learn from the mistakes.
DO: Have the ability to scrap a trail section, a drop, or a jump, if it isn't fun, or doesn't work. Its heart breaking at times, but its the right thing to do, and deep inside of you mtb heart, you know it.
Real life example: My (good) local trail builders told me of this 400m section they where building on for 3 months, cutting down trees, adjusting and test riding. But in the end it just wasn't fun. They took a deep breath, shed a tear, and abandoned it. 3 months of hard work down the drain. It sucks, but its for the greater good.

DON'T: Ignore what doesn't work. It will haunt you, and your fellow riders, and depress the overall joy on the trail.


Make the best use of the terrain.
DO: Take every advantage of the terrain possible. Squeeze the most out of it. Scope it not once, but twice, preferable three time, to make sure you take absolute best advantage of it.

DON'T: Ignore the terrain ,  THE MOST OBVIOUS LINE IS NOT ALWAYS THE BEST.

One hill, two different lines, be smart about what line you decide to build.

Trail maintenance is not an option, its a MUST DO.
DO: Take care of your trails. Riding will be hard on your trail, and the trail will slowly die on you if don't groom you trail. Service it, and you will have a trail that works as intentioned. It might even get a bit better after some time.

DON'T: Ignore the importance of trail maintenance. The result will be a damaged trail, that will suck the fun out of it, and you can even risk permanent trail damage.
Real life example: Well, I bet you know a trail or two that hasn't been serviced for a while, and it tells.


Trail testing: (ADJUST or ABANDON)
DO: Test what you have build. Its simple actually; is it fun? Challenging? Does the flow work? If you can answer "No" to one of these points, then ADJUST or ABANDON.

DON'T: Underestimate the value of the test-riding and micro adjustments. Micro adjustments can make or break a line!


Build With Passion
Jack Nicklaus pretty much nailed it: "I'm a firm believer in the theory that people only do their best at things they truly enjoy. It is difficult to excel at something you don't enjoy."
DO: Build with passion, it will most likely reflect on the trail. Passion breeds quality.

DON'T: If you don't enjoy it - It will tell.



Hope you enjoyed this post, and my mad paint-skillz as well. This is my tribute to all the great trail builders out there, you guys rock. If you have a comment, something to add or critique, then don't be shy, bring it to the comments section, it doesn't require a sign-in.

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Earn it

Guinea pigging the new tree-gap. Man I had to dewire some neurons, before hitting that shit.

Calculating it.
(click to enlarge)

Hitting it.
(click to enlarge)

Landing it.
(click to enlarge)

Earning it.
(click to enlarge)

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Random shots Part 2/2


Yosemite Valley. Just wow! I had 3 days in the valley, and was blown away, haven't seen such beautiful scenery since British Columbia.
(click to enlarge)

Jan, near the very tip of the trail gap, he had some difficulties clearing it, and the frustration began to build up. I don't know how much comfort it was, but it told him that we've "all been there before", in some way or another.
(click to enlarge)

We had a chance to revisit a place we usually only ride at winter. And we brought the big bikes, not because we had to, but because we could. Turned out that the lines worked better when covered in snow.
(click to enlarge)

Christian improvising a line.
(click to enlarge)

I replaced my CCDBA, with a 2014 Vivid AIR. It got its fair share of attention earlier this year, when RockShox trolled everyone by saying it was for "pro-use" only, and you actually had to be on their "list" to buy it. But in the end, we all love capitalism, and so does Rockshox = This shock is mine.
So whats cool about it? Well, independent LSR and HSR, and the new Rapid Recovery system, and the Counter Measure technology. The latter is supposed to virtually eliminate break away force, and I have to give it to RockShox, it takes VERY little force to activate it, less than the CCDBA, well, less than any air-system I've been on actually. Impressive. Full preview coming soon.
(click to enlarge)

There she is. The new tree-gap.
3,6m(11ft) just to clear the tree, then an additional 2,4m (7ft) to hit the transition. Not small numbers considering this is an All Mountain trail. You can just barely make out the trail gap in the background, it functions as a booster to this jump. How much speed does it require? Is the landing ok? Is the ramp angled correctly? Will it kill you? Well, yesterday, all of those questions got answered..Stay tuned.
(click to enlarge)

Saturday, July 20, 2013

Random shots Part 1/2


Lets start of with this interesting bike. Its a bike Henning got to rent, when we visited Winterberg Bikepark in Germany. I had a chance to try it out as well. This is the new Bergamont Straitline, with a Boxxer up front, and a Vivid Air out back. 2 things surprised me; How fun the bike was to ride, and how well the Vivid Air performed. I remember when Bergamont made bikes that resembled something out of DDR...they have definitely stepped up these last few seasons.
(click to enlarge)

Jan taking a small departure near the trail. What I like about this pic, is that it captures what its all about. Thinking outside the box, playing around, trying out things, learning by success, and by failures. But most important, having fun on two wheels. Stay foolish. stay hungry - right?

Oh btw, what I originally wanted to write here was: "Jan does a table".....ged ittt???
(click to enlarge)

Coming in from lower right corner.
(click to enlarge)
(click to enlarge)

Testing a line. Unfortunately it wasn't up to standards, and its already in the process of "un-installation". Its all about keeping the bar high, and not settling with something that's just "ok".
(click to enlarge)

Summer, the best thing since sliced bread.
(click to enlarge)

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Status of my Cane Creek Double Barrel Air - and why I wont review it.

It all started so good. An amazing performance, a massive amount of adjustments, and an unquestionable positive reputation. Cane Creek Double Barrel Air - whats not to like?


Then the problems began.

The first fail came after less than 2 months of riding, the LS-rebound stopped working, and the compression was odd. "A freak fail"- I thought to myself. The shock got sent back to TF-tuned, and they fixed it - "emulsified oil" - was the initial TF-Tuned conclusion. 

The second fail came a month later. The shock made a loud *POP* sound during a session, and all of the sudden, all rebound was gone. FACEPALM. Back to TF-tuned with the shock. No theory was given this time. Got the shock back.

Third fail came after a month of additional use. LS-compression was off, and the shock made a *clunk*-sound 30% into its travel when in use. 2 things to say about that fail; I was no longer surprised. Secondly, enough was enough, the Double Barrel Air had to go. I want my gear to function - just like you do.


I contacted TF-Tuned, and told them that I wanted a refund. The TF-tuned guys are awesome, a full refund was given, and they even offered me a Ti-coil version of the CCDB in exchange. They got in touch with Cane Creek about the issues I have ran into. Cane Creek didn't have any theory, nor did TF-Tuned, as to why my shock kept failing. I checked my frame for any misalignment - there was none. I didn't have this problem with the other shocks I had. This leaves me clueless as to why this shock kept failing. 

I did some research on the internetzz, and no-one has had the same issues as I. Pretty much every user talks about reliability - a completely different story than I can present.

So I decided not to review this shock (it would be torn to pieces, due to the reliability issues anyway). I'm under the impression that I got some freak-issue-monday-version, or something like that, and I don't want to pass a review-judgement on that premise. This is where it ends for me and the CCDBA. 


Oh... a new high-tech shock is already installed btw... stick around... ; )

Friday, July 12, 2013

Mexican Monkey

Random high-speed footage.

53sec. Simple edit. 240fps.

Sunday, July 7, 2013

The 300th post, and 44.000 visits in a single year. Thanks!

44.000. Whoa, I'm not even sure I really understand that number. But thanks, makes it all worthwhile!

To wrap this post up, I attach a completely unrelated picture of my hero, Bill Maher. Thanks all.

"If you think you have it tough, read history books." -Bill Maher

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Gear update

Ok, back from NorCal, lets get to it;

2 POC products, and a new fork - whats not to like?

First POC product is the Bone VPD Leg. I have been grinding through alot of leg armor during my mtb years, and been disappointed by every single full-leg armor I've worn, hell, I even made an open whine about it here on this blog. That is until I got the POC Bone VPD Leg late last year. Its solid, has decent ventilation, straps are well placed, but the best part is...
(click to enlarge)

...a knee-hinge system. Finally someone gets it! The upper knee is a thick VPD shell (Polymer dough) that moves independently of the lower leg. This allows for more movement, without the usual drawbacks of a full leg-armor, like pad movement. I have been combining the Bone VPD Leg with the POC Joint Ankle - with very good results, definately a recommended setup. So anyway, Ive illustrated were the VPD knee-shell is, below:
(click to enlarge)

Got a front-end setup change. The 2013 RockShox LyrikDH. Lyrik on the outside, Boxxer on the inside. So far its been performing better than expected, taking small and big hits with ease, and an actual mid-travel performance (YAY!). The low-speed compression keeps the fork dead-stable on climbs, and the high-speed compression allows me to manipulate the end-travel-curve as I see fit. It has a build-in high-speed rebound damper as well, but I dont notice it to be honest, it just feels right. I need to do some more testing tho', before wrapping it all up in a potential review. Weight is identical to a FOX 36 btw.
(click to enlarge)

Not the cheapest choice, but hopefully one of the smartest. Let it be said right away, from what Ive experienced so far, the POC VPD2 Knee delivers! Surprisingly good overall protection, with good knee coverage (side of the knee included), and a snug fit. The top and bottom has a rubber band stitched into it to make "stick" to the leg. Only disadvantage so far, is that it gets more hot than I expected on warm days. I was actually planning to get the Leatt Knee Guard 3DF, but after trying one out, I wondered what Leatt has been smoking when designing their knee guard; no side protection! Anyway, expect a big comparison review soon (FOX vs 661 vs Scott vs POC).
(click to enlarge)

Whilst not featuring a hinge system like the POC VPD Bone Leg, it is however divided into 2 separate sections. The lower section (blue) covers the knee in the front and sides, and a bit of the shin as well. The top (green), covers the top knee, to the lower thigh. This system allows the pad to move WITH the leg, and not ON the leg. Clever design choice POC, very clever.
(click to enlarge)

Lyrik + POC VPD2 Knee in action.
(click to enlarge)